- Professional Risks Insurance
- Private Clients
- Farms & Estates
- Commercial Clients
- Wholesale Insurance Broking
- Claims
- About
- Contact
- Log in
11.06.26
As more homeowners move towards environmentally friendly heating options, biomass boilers have become increasingly popular. While they offer a sustainable alternative to oil or gas, many property owners are surprised to encounter difficulties when arranging insurance. In some cases, insurers may be cautious or even decline cover entirely.
This isn’t a reflection of opposition to green energy. Instead, it comes down to how insurers assess risk. From their perspective, biomass systems present a very different risk profile compared to conventional heating systems.

Biomass boilers rely on burning organic materials such as logs, pellets, or wood chips. Unlike sealed gas or oil systems, they involve visible combustion and on-site fuel storage.
This introduces additional fire-related risks, including sparks, embers, and the presence of combustible materials. Even when a system is correctly installed, the act of storing and burning solid fuel increases the overall risk compared to modern gas systems, which are closed and tightly controlled.
A key part of any biomass system is the storage of fuel, which is often kept either inside the property or nearby.
Insurers tend to be cautious when:
While some of these scenarios are uncommon, they still add complexity when insurers assess potential exposure.
Unlike gas boilers, which are subject to well-established and widely enforced regulations, biomass systems vary more in design and installation quality.
Common concerns include:
This lack of consistency can make it harder for insurers to properly evaluate the risk.
Biomass boilers typically require more regular upkeep than conventional heating systems. This includes clearing ash, maintaining combustion chambers, and checking flues or chimneys.
If maintenance is neglected, the likelihood of issues such as fire, smoke damage, or breakdown increases. Insurers therefore factor in the risk that maintenance standards may vary over time.
In the event of a claim, repairing or replacing a biomass system can be more involved than dealing with standard boilers. Specialist engineers and replacement parts are not always easily available.
This can lead to higher costs and longer repair times, which in turn increases the potential size of a claim from an insurer’s perspective.
Compared with gas or oil systems, biomass heating remains relatively niche. This means insurers have less long-term claims data to draw on when pricing and underwriting policies.
Where there is uncertainty, insurers tend to be more cautious—either by increasing premiums or declining to offer cover.
If you already have a biomass system, or are planning to install one, there are ways to make your property more attractive to insurers:
With specialist knowledge of biomass systems, associated risks, and current installation standards, Cox Mahon can present your property to insurers in the best possible light. This helps secure appropriate cover at a competitive price—while also reducing the likelihood of complications if you ever need to make a claim.
Information provided by Harrison Law, (Cert CII) Head of Commercial & Private Clients, Cox Mahon Ltd.
Complete the details below and we will contact shortly.