- Professional Risk Insurance
- Private Clients
- Farms & Estates
- Commercial Clients
- Wholesale Insurance Broking
- Claims
- About
- Contact
- Log in
14.10.20
2020 has undoubtedly been a challenging year for everyone. However, in respect of Professional Indemnity (PI) Insurance for Chartered Surveyors, the market has, and continues to, encounter significant headwinds; in respect of changes/restrictions to policy coverage, availability of cover and pricing.
What are the factors, and why?
Over the past 18 months, there has been significant change in the insurance market with a number of insurers withdrawing from the PI market and rates hardening (increasing). This started as a result of a 2018 Lloyd’s of London review, which highlighted the underpricing of PI Insurance and showed that two thirds of syndicates were underwriting at a loss. Consequently, a number of Lloyd’s syndicates withdrew from some or all of the PI Insurance market. This contraction of capacity and rate review has permeated through to all participating primary insurers.
In May, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) removed the prescribed fire safety exclusions wording from the minimum policy terms and has now permitted insurers to apply their own fire safety exclusions. In addition, following concerns around completing the EWS1 form and the liability that could derive from RICS members that complete the form, an exclusion of liability has been inserted into the new terms.
Insurers are now permitted to revise their wording to apply:
The economic consequences of the pandemic will undoubtedly be very significant and insurers are forecasting that the resulting recession will, as with past economic downturns, lead to an increase in claims activity and resulting losses for insurers.
Across the spectrum of qualifying insurers, rates have increased. Minimum increases of 10%-20% are the norm. However, we have experienced, or heard of, some cases where rates have increased by significantly more (>50%). Many insurers have adjusted their underwriting strategy for surveyors and have been looking to reduce their exposure by reducing their limits on existing business and the appetite of underwriters to write new business has become very limited. Unfortunately, there has been a number of instances where insurers have declined to offer renewal terms altogether – both for primary and excess layer cover. No surprises but firms with lending valuation exposure have been hardest hit.
The introduction of the unlimited aggregate round the clock limit of liability for primary cover has had the, perhaps unintended, consequence that excess layer capacity attaching above the primary have increased their rates considerably, as their potential exposure has increased. This introduction has possibly been another factor in lack of appetite for new business amongst excess layer insurers.
Author: Richard Amphlett. October 2020